Last week I blogged about how bad North Carolina's pension investment returns have been. This week, I thought I'd point out a simple solution to the
poor performance. A simple portfolio of Vanguard Index Mutual Funds not
only would beat the performance of North Carolina's pension, but has
outperformed more than 75% of all public pensions over the past 3, 5, and 10
year periods. (Click here and see page 4 for investment returns of all public pensions).
1-Year
|
3-Year
|
5-Year
|
10-Year
|
||||||
9.97%
|
8.82%
|
7.78%
|
6.89%
|
||||||
Median
Public Pension
|
12.25%
|
10.29%
|
8.23%
|
7.27%
|
|||||
Passive
Index Mutual Funds*
|
12.33%
|
12.00%
|
10.33%
|
8.42%
|
|||||
NC Under-performance vs. Index
Funds
|
-2.36%
|
-3.18%
|
-2.55%
|
-1.53%
|
|||||
NC Tax-payer cost for
under-performance
|
$2
|
Billion
|
$8
|
Billion
|
$11
|
Billion
|
$13
|
Billion
|
|
Why all pensions don't index is a mystery to me? North Carolina ’s pension
at $83 billion, like many public pensions, are so large, it's inconceivable
that their 240+ external managers could collectively outperform "the
market." It is ridiculous – and
expensive – for them to even try.
How expensive? While North
Carolina’s 240 external managers are paid roughly $300-400 million each year(and growing rapidly, click here and see page 8), North Carolina’s underperformance versus a simple
portfolio of index mutual funds has cost tax payers roughly $13 Billion over
the past 10 years*. Stated another way,
the North Carolina
pension could have been $13 billion bigger had they never taken money away from
stocks and bonds only to squander it on expensive, poor performing
alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate,
and especially commodities.
The majority of this underperformance and cost has been due to particularly
poor performance the past 5 years as North Carolina Treasurer Janet Cowell has increased the fund's allocation to so-called alternative investments in the name of "diversification" from 10% to 20% with an ultimate goal of 35%. As the above performance figures clearly show, North Carolina ’s performance
has continued to get worse and worse relative to other pension funds and simple
index funds over time.
* NOTE: The simple portfolio of Vanguard Index Mutual Funds that
beat North Carolina
and more than 75% of all pension funds, is from page 32 of my book “TheRollover IRA Cookbook.” The returns above
have been calculated using Morningstar’s portfolio scenario tools with
semi-annual re-balancing. The portfolio of 65% stock mutual funds and 35% bond mutual funds approximates
a similar asset allocation and risk profile as the North Carolina pension fund which is currently allocated 68% to stocks and alternatives and 32% to bonds. NC tax payer costs were estimated using a simple time-value of money financial calculator.
The return of the "Passive Index Mutual Fund" portfolio above is AFTER all investment fees and expenses as are the North Carolina Retirement System returns. The Median Public Pension returns above are from BNY Mellon Public Pension Universe which is reported BEFORE fees (which is dumb since expenses matter quite a lot). So, if we could account for pension fund fees, the "Passive Index Mutual Fund" portfolio would likely beat far more than 75% of all public pension plans - likely as many as 90% over ten years and even more over longer periods.
ReplyDelete